daggle. Closed beta

Chaotic conversations to traceable documents.

Daggle remembers the meeting, call or corridor conversation behind every change to your documents, and gives stakeholders a sign off that is bound to the exact words they agreed to.

Currently in closed beta.

Statement of work v3

2.1

The supplier will deliver the integration test environment by the end of phase one.

Signed: Legal, Client
2.2

Acceptance testing runs for ten fifteen working days after handover.

Pending sign off from Product and Client
2.3

Defects found during acceptance are fixed at no additional cost.

Signed: Legal, Product, Client

Sign off at whatever level suits you

A whole document, a section, or a single clause: each stakeholder signs off exactly what they are responsible for and nothing more. Legal might sign one clause, the client a section, Product the whole document. Whatever the level, signatures are bound to the exact text, so if the words change the signatures are void and need signing again.

Every edit cites a decision

Decisions still happen in meetings, threads and calls. Daggle is where they get formalised. Each edit must cite the decision behind it, so from any sentence you can see why it says what it says, from any decision you can see every sentence that rests on it, and from either you can see which stakeholders signed off the changes.

Agreed versions become releases

Documents are never "signed". They are released: an immutable label on an exact tree state plus its signatures, with a signed manifest your organisation holds outside the system. Release-to-release diffs show what changed, on whose authority, and who signed off the changes. Any release can be exported as a PDF or Markdown document, so the agreed version can go wherever it needs to.

Two questions a shared doc cannot answer

When something goes wrong at delivery, the document records what changed, by whom and when. It says nothing about why, or on whose authority. Daggle answers both, from any sentence, at any point in the history.

Built for teams that agree on words

Product, legal and engineering specifying a new offering. Agencies and clients agreeing scope. Statements of work, tender responses and regulated internal specs. Anywhere a shared document with "looks good to me" comments is currently standing in for an agreement.

Registration privacy notice